Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Seventeenth Amendment To The United States Constitution totally explained

The Seventeenth Amendment (Amendment XVII) of the United States Constitution was passed by the Senate on June 12, 1911 and by the House on May 13, 1912. It was ratified on April 8, 1913 and was first put into effect for the election of 1914. It amends Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution to provide for the direct election of Senators by the people of a state rather than their election or appointment by a state legislature. Also, it allows the governor or executive authority of each state, if authorized by that state's legislature, to appoint a senator in the event of an opening, until an election occurs. It was passed and ratified during the Progressive Era.

Text

Historical background

The selection of delegates to the Constitutional Convention established the precedent that states could choose Federal officials at a higher level than direct election. Originally, each Senator was to be elected by his state legislature to represent his state, providing one of the many necessary governmental checks and balances. They also expected that Senators elected by state legislatures would be able to concentrate on the business at hand without regional pressure from the populace, aided by a longer term than Representatives.
   This process worked without major problems through the mid-1850s, when the American Civil War was in the offing. Due to increasing partisanship and strife, many state legislatures failed to elect Senators for prolonged periods. For example, in Indiana the conflict between Democrats in the southern half of the state and the emerging Republican Party in the northern half prevented an election for two years. The aforementioned partisanship led to contentious battles in the legislatures, as the struggle to elect senators reflected the increasing regional tensions in the lead up to the American Civil War.
   After the war, problems still multiplied. In one case in the mid-1860s, the election of Senator John Stockton from New Jersey was contested on the grounds that he'd been elected by a plurality rather than a majority in the state legislature. Stockton defended himself on the grounds that the exact method for elections was murky and varied from state to state. To keep this from happening again, Congress passed a law in 1866 regulating how and when Senators were to be elected from each state. This was the first change in the process of senatorial elections. While the law helped, there were still deadlocks in some legislatures and accusations of bribery, corruption and suspicious dealings in some elections. Nine bribery cases were brought before the Senate between 1866 and 1906, and 45 deadlocks occurred in 20 states between 1891 and 1905, resulting in numerous delays in seating senators. Beginning in 1899, Delaware didn't send a senator to Washington for four years.
   Reform efforts began as early as 1826, when direct election was first proposed. In the 1870s, voters sent a petition to the House for popular election. From 1893 to 1902, momentum increased considerably. Each year during that period, a Constitutional amendment to elect Senators by popular vote was proposed in Congress, but the Senate fiercely resisted. In the mid-1890s, the Populist Party incorporated the direct election of Senators into its platform, although neither the Democrats nor the Republicans paid much notice at the time. Direct election was also part of the Wisconsin Idea championed by Republican progressive Robert La Follette and Nebraska Republican reformer George Norris. In the early 1900s, Oregon pioneered direct election and experimented with different measures over several years until it succeeded in 1907. Soon after, Nebraska followed suit and laid the foundation for other states to adopt measures for direct election.
   After the turn of the century, momentum for reform grew rapidly. William Randolph Hearst expanded his publishing empire with Cosmopolitan, which became a respected general-interest magazine and championed the cause of direct election with muckraking articles and strong advocacy of reform. Hearst hired a veteran reporter, David Graham Phillips, who wrote scathing pieces on Senators, portraying them as corrupt pawns of industrialists and financiers. The pieces became a series titled "The Treason of the Senate," which appeared in several monthly issues of the magazine in 1906.
   Increasingly, Senators were elected based on state referenda, similar to the means developed by Oregon. By 1912, as many as 29 states elected Senators either as nominees of party primaries or in conjunction with a general election. As representatives of a direct election process, the new senators supported measures that argued for legislation, but in order to achieve total reform, a Constitutional amendment was required. In 1911, Senator Joseph Bristow from Kansas offered a resolution, proposing an amendment. The idea enjoyed strong support from Senator William Borah of Idaho, himself a product of direct election. Eight Southern Senators and all Republican Senators from New England, New York, and Pennsylvania opposed Bristow's resolution. The Senate approved the resolution largely because of the senators who had been elected by state-initiated reforms, many of whom were serving their first term, and therefore may have been more willing to support direct election. After the Senate passed the amendment, the measure moved to the House.
   The House initially fared no better than the Senate in its early discussions of the proposed amendment. In the summer of 1912 the House finally passed the amendment and sent it to the states for ratification. The campaign for public support was aided by Senators such as Borah and political scientist George H. Haynes, whose scholarly work on the Senate contributed greatly to passage of the amendment. The following states ratified the amendment:
  • Massachusetts (1912-05-22)
  • Arizona (1912-06-03)
  • Minnesota (1912-06-10)
  • New York (1913-01-15)
  • Kansas (1913-01-17)
  • Oregon (1913-01-23)
  • North Carolina (1913-01-25)
  • California (1913-01-28)
  • Michigan (1913-01-28)
  • Iowa (1913-01-30)
  • Montana (1913-01-30)
  • Idaho (1913-01-31)
  • West Virginia (1913-02-04)
  • Colorado (1913-02-05)
  • Nevada (1913-02-06)
  • Texas (1913-02-07)
  • Washington (1913-02-07)
  • Wyoming (1913-02-08)
  • Arkansas (1913-02-11)
  • Maine (1913-02-11)
  • Illinois (1913-02-13)
  • North Dakota (1913-02-14)
  • Wisconsin (1913-02-18)
  • Indiana (1913-02-19)
  • New Hampshire (1913-02-19)
  • Vermont (1913-02-19)
  • South Dakota (1913-02-19)
  • Oklahoma (1913-02-24)
  • Ohio (1913-02-25)
  • Missouri (1913-03-07)
  • New Mexico (1913-03-13)
  • Nebraska (1913-03-14)
  • New Jersey (1913-03-17)
  • Tennessee (1913-04-01)
  • Pennsylvania (1913-04-02)
  • Connecticut (1913-04-08) Ratification was completed on 1913-04-08, having the required three-fourths majority. The amendment was subsequently ratified by the following state:
  • Louisiana (1913-06-11) The following state rejected the amendment:
  • Utah (1913-02-26) The following states legislature failed to complete action on the amendment:
  • Florida (Never reached the State Senate)

    Calls for repeal

    There are some who have called for the repeal of the Seventeenth Amendment. For example, former Senator Zell Miller, upon retiring from the Senate, said “Direct elections of Senators … allowed Washington’s special interests to call the shots, whether it's filling judicial vacancies, passing laws, or issuing regulations.” Thomas DiLorenzo, author of The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, said "The Seventeenth Amendment was one of the last nails to be pounded into the coffin of federalism in America. Some blame the Amendment, together with the Sixteenth Amendment, for the expansion of the authority of the United States Congress in the twentieth century.

    Further Information

    Get more info on 'Seventeenth Amendment To The United States Constitution'.


    External Link Exchanges

    Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

      <a href="http://seventeenth_amendment_to_the_united_states_constitution.totallyexplained.com">Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Totally Explained</a>

    Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
       As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



  • Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
    This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version